The State of Rights and Democracy in the
Strongman’s War on Drugs
A
Reflection Paper by Lourenzo Manimtim
“If I make it to the presidential palace, I will do just what I did as mayor. You drug pushers, holdup men, and
do-nothings, you better get out because I'll kill you.” (Human Rights Watch, Conde, 2017)
On May 9, 2016, the former president said those words beginning
the herald of the campaign against illegal drugs— The “War on Drugs”. Not too
long since words were spoken death and misery have spiked in the country in the
first six (6) months of his presidency— the administration has led to an
unprecedented number of killings (Rapper, 2016). Many people were killed, and
many were slain in this bloody and brutal war. Reminiscence of this wretched
memory still lingers in the minds of the people. The rampant cases and
detrimental breaches of human rights and the attacks of the state to human
rights defenders and organizations in defiance to the “War on Drugs”. The
country has succumbed into a great state of chaos and discord
(Estrada-Castillo, et. al, 2022). It was common for police officers to shoot
and kill drug users in the pretext of “nanlaban”
and illegal possession of dangerous drugs. And these actions conducted by state
agents were not condemned but strongly supported by the president even as far
as protecting state officers from prosecution (Human Rights Watch, 2017). Research
and studies conducted by the Human Rights Watch even found evidence of
fact that police issues plant falsifying evidence to justify the unlawful
killings.
There was a call growing
call for an investigation, but Duterte has vowed to continue the
campaign (Human Rights Watch, Conde, 2017). Many
experts have coined this rampant illegal killing as “Extra Judicial Killings”
or EJKs. The “Anti-Extra Judicial Killing Act of 2019” refers the “EJK” as the
deliberate killing of persons, carried out by agents of the State and under its
order in lieu of arrest, investigation, and prosecution.
The
War on Drugs is one of the premiere government programs launched and enacted by
Pres. Rodrigo Duterte, it has faced enormous of criticisms, deficits, and issues.
Faced by challenges, it has been a root of controversy, issues, and death. The
program has been greatly criticized as one of the worst crimes against humanity
with 20,000 people dead as estimated by Human Rights Organizations and at least
2,555 of the killings accounted to the Philippine National Police, according to
the data collected by Human Rights Watch (Schlein, 2022).
It is vivid that this program is misery and has been a
major slap and an upfront unhampering violation against human rights. With many
people unlawfully killed and shot dead, violating the people’s inherent human
rights to “Right to Life, Right to Fair Trial and the Right to Writ of Habeas
Corpus”. Human Rights Defenders and Advocates had expressed deep concerns and
conducted domestic remedies to prevent and reject the inhumane and abusive
implementation of the administration’s “War on Drugs”. However, they are met
with swift, disturbing and a relentless response (Gascon, 2018).
The whole premise of the War on Drugs is both a crime
against human rights and undemocratic. In the striking speech of the late Commissioner
of the Commission Human Rights (CHR) in the Philippines, Mr. Jose Luis “Chito”
Gascon, in the Oslo Freedom Forum in 2018 argued that the Philippine
government’s campaign in the “War on Drugs” is both undemocratic and a crime
against human rights. It is Anti-Poor, Anti-Human Rights and Anti-Rule of Law. It
was a crime, and many were people hunted, targeted, and unlawfully killed.
The quickness, brutality and the simple and
straightforward directive posed by President Duterte, in process of this
violent campaign has shown to be an aspect of an image of a strongman. A recent Time magazine cover has proclaimed the rise of the strongman.
The argument of the strongman is not new, its proposition has always been
simple and straightforward. It essentially offers the false choice between the
uncertain future of living free in a democracy or guarantee of some security
and stability that is offered by a strongman in exchange for diminished
freedom. (Gascon, 2018)
Presently, Former President Rodrigo Duterte, is still under
the watchful probe of the International Criminal Court (ICC) but his power
protrudes, preventing the ICC to interfere and conduct investigations in
matters regards to the Philippine War on Drugs (Engelbrecht, 2021). the same
time the former president still strongly expresses that even as a civilian he
aims to pursue the “War on Drugs” the former president also urged upcoming
President Ferdinand Marco Jr. to continue and pursue the program he started but
in his own desired way (Cervantes, 2022).
The “War on Drugs” has put people in a pedestal, the strongman holds the
grip of power and commands fear in the prospect of law & order. An order
which caused more deaths than life. The program is justified in division of the
good vs bad, in some cases it can even be related to justification through
moral antagonism, the principle of the good us and evil them. In which this can
be depicted in a moral standpoint, the anomaly between the Law Enforcement vs
Drug Users. Where people will create an image that the Law Enforcers as the
good, and Drug Users are bad. So, it is okay to kill drug users, because they
are bad, and a bad look to society. And this phenomenon, is what strongman, and
leader with authoritarian qualities implement. A violent populism to support
their public mandate, justifying their corrupt cause as for the people to
follow and obey as the good.
We are all called to protect
human rights, to defend the ramparts of international justice and to deepen our
democracy, to ensure that all who seek to diminish and negate our freedoms will
be held accountable. (Gascon, 2018).
The “War
on Drugs” paints the picture of a real society the consequence of a society
without respect to human rights, respect to the rule of law and respect to our
Democracy. It is all stated in the 1987
Constitution in the “Bill of Rights” all our equal rights and privileges as
citizens of democracy. We are the sovereign, and we are given the freedom to do
our will.
We are
ought to responsibly use and respect our human rights, and to practice the
significance and values of our democracy.
In final
words of this paper, I would like to leave words of remark that “The Fate of
This Nation Lies Within the Hands of its Own People”.
Thank you
and Blessed Be God Forever!
References:
· Bouckaert,
P. (2022). “License to Kill”. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from
https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/03/02/license-kill/philippine-police-killings-dutertes-war-drugs
· Conde,
C. (2017). “Philippines ‘War on Drugs’”. Retrieved from
https://www.hrw.org/tag/philippines-war-drugs
·
Cervantes, F. (2022). “PRRD asks Marcos
to continue anti-drug campaign his ‘own
way’”. Retrieved from https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1175251
· De
Lima, L. (2019). “An Act Defining Extrajudicial Killing, Providing For its
Penalty
and
Other Purposes”. Retrieved from https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/3066327517!.pdf
·
Engelbrecht, G. (2021). “Philippines: The
International Criminal Court Goes After
Duturte’s
Drug War”. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/philippines/philippines-international-criminal-court-goes-after-dutertes-drug-war
·
Estrada-Castillo, et. al. (2022). End
‘war on drugs’ and promote policies rooted in human
rights: UN Experts. Retrieved
from
https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2022/06/end-war-drugs-and-promote-
policies-rooted-human-rights-un-
experts#:~:text=In%20a%20major%20study%20released,of%20people%20who%
20use%20drugs%2C
·
JOSE LUIS MARTIN “CHITO” GASCON | DEATH AND
THE DEMOCRATIC
DEFICITS IN DUTERTE’S DRUG WAR | 2018. (n.d.).
YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddm3MGqeFEE&t=357s
· Rappler.
(2016). Duturte’s war on drugs: The first 6 months. RAPPLER.
https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/153510-rodrigo-duterte-war-on-drugs-2016/
·
Schlein L. (2022). UN: For Victims of
Philippines ‘War on Drugs,’ Justice Remins
Elusive. Retrieved from https://www.voanews.com/a/un-for-victims-of-
philippines-war-on-drugs-justice-remains-elusive/6780138.html
·
The Philippine Constitution (1987). Article
III The Bill of Rights. Retrieved from
https://getliner.com/picked-by-liner/reader-mode?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.officialgazette.gov.ph%2Fconstitutions%2Fthe-1987-constitution-of-the-republic-of-the-philippines%2Fthe-1987-constitution-of-the-republic-of-the-philippines-article-iii%2F
Comments
Post a Comment